Congressional District 5Duval (part), St. Johns, Flagler (part)

U.S. House, District 5

Represents Florida's 5th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives; votes on federal laws and spending. Term: 2 years.

Partly verified. Either the November opponent could not be confirmed from available sources, or only a few positions are documented. Confirm the full candidate list on your county sample ballot; unknown positions are shown as such.

How we verified who is on the ballot

UPDATE (Sept 2026 research pass): Rutherford won the Aug. 18, 2026 Republican primary with about 67.7% to 32.3% for challenger Mark Kaye, per a NewsForce post on X citing results ; Ballotpedia's primary page lists the contest ). The percentage comes from a social-media post and should be confirmed against the Florida Division of Elections. Both Trump-endorsement roundups also list Rutherford as a primary winner . Action News Jax/AP reports Rachel Grage won the Aug. 18, 2026 Democratic nomination in the 5th District . The result of the Republican primary among incumbent John Rutherford, Mark Kaye and Donald Muirheid (Ballotpedia roster: was NOT found in searches run for this guide; Rutherford is listed below as the incumbent primary candidate with his nomination unconfirmed. NPA/write-in candidates not confirmed. Florida's Legislature passed a new congressional map in the April 2026 special session (Senate vote 21-17 on April 29, 2026) and the Florida Supreme Court on June 10, 2026 declined (6-1) to block it, so the new district lines apply to the Nov. 3, 2026 election; litigation on the merits continues. ; ; County list reflects pre-2026 district boundaries unless a 2026 source is cited; boundaries changed under the April 2026 map and the exact new county composition was not confirmed in searches run for this guide.

See how you match in this race →

One candidate in this race is a write-in. Florida does not print a qualified write-in candidate's name on the ballot. To vote for one you must write the name on the write-in line for this race; a blank or misspelled line may not be counted.

Photo of John Rutherford

John Rutherford

RepublicanIncumbentU.S. Representative (since 2017); former Jacksonville sheriff

John Rutherford, a former Jacksonville sheriff, has served in the U.S. House since 2017. He won the Aug. 18, 2026 Republican primary with about 68% over radio host Mark Kaye, per results posted by NewsForce on X (to be confirmed with the Division of Elections). He was endorsed by President Trump for 2026 and voted for…

Photo of Rachel Grage

Rachel Grage

DemocraticBiomedical engineer and grassroots activist (Ballotpedia)

Rachel Grage was born in Oswego, N.Y., and earned bachelor's and master's degrees in engineering from Tulane University; she has worked as a biomedical engineer researching biomechanics, cardiac interventions and therapies for children with cerebral palsy (Ballotpedia; campaign site). She ran for Florida House Distric…

William Upham

Write-inWrite-in candidate: the name is not printed on the ballot; voters must write it on the blank line

William Upham is a write-in candidate in Florida's 5th Congressional District. He was born and raised in a military family, served as a Marine Corps officer until a medical retirement as a First Lieutenant, and worked as a prosecutor in Pensacola and Jacksonville. His campaign is built around faith and family, biparti…

Side-by-side on the major issues

AgreeDiffer a littleDiffer stronglyNot enough data· hover for details, click to jump to the row
Taxes & spendingHousing affordabilityImmigrationAbortionGunsHealth careSocial Security & MedicareEducation & school choiceEnvironment & waterElections & votingCrime & policingGender identity lawsEnergy & utilitiesTariffs & tradeUkraineTrump administrationVeterans
Where the candidates in this race split, issue by issue.
Strongly agreesLeans agreeMixed / neutralLeans disagreeStrongly disagreesNo public position found

Each row is a statement. The chips show how each candidate's stated positions or record relate to that statement. Expand a row to read the evidence and sources. "No public position found" means we could not find a statement or record on the topic, not that the candidate has none.

Show:
IssueJohn Rutherford
Republican
Rachel Grage
Democratic
William Upham
Write-in
Taxes & spendingCutting taxes should be a top priority, even if it means less government spending on services. Strongly agrees· based on record
Voted for H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) in 2025, which extended the 2017 individual tax cuts and created new deductions (tips, overtime) while reducing projected federal spending on Medicaid and SNAP. His statement said the bill gives Americans 'a much-needed tax break' and 'historic tax relief for seniors'; his site maintains a 'Tax Cuts for Working Americans' page.
No public position foundNo public position found
Housing affordabilityGovernment should do more to make housing affordable (subsidies, zoning changes, rent measures). No public position foundNo public position foundNo public position found
ImmigrationImmigration enforcement should be stricter, including large-scale deportation of people in the country illegally. Strongly agrees· based on recordMixed / neutral· stated position
Supports 'securing the border through smart, efficient enforcement' while maintaining 'a fair and humane immigration system that respects due process'; no position on large-scale deportation was found.
No public position found
AbortionAbortion should be legal in most cases (Florida's six-week ban should be repealed or loosened). Leans disagree· based on record
His statement on the FY2026 appropriations bills highlighted provisions to 'defund abortion-related travel' at the Department of War; Reproductive Freedom for All's scorecard tracks his votes as opposing abortion access. A statement on Florida's six-week ban was not found.
Strongly agrees· stated position
Supports protecting access to reproductive health care including abortion; Ballotpedia lists her as legislative chair of Jacksonville NOW, which backs allowing abortion before viability and exceptions to six-week bans. Florida Choice Tracker lists her as pro-choice.
No public position found
GunsGun laws should be stricter (keep the red-flag law and the age-21 purchase rule; expand background checks) rather than looser (permitless or open carry, lower purchase age). No public position foundNo public position foundNo public position found
Health careGovernment should expand its role in health coverage (expand Medicaid in Florida, extend Affordable Care Act subsidies). Leans disagree· based on record
Voted for H.R. 1 (2025), which added Medicaid work-reporting requirements and other eligibility changes and did not extend the enhanced ACA premium subsidies; the vote is coded as leaning against expanding the federal role in coverage.
Leans agree· stated position
Pledges to use her health-care background to fight for lower insurance costs and expanded access and coverage.
No public position found
Social Security & MedicareSocial Security and Medicare benefits must be protected from any cuts, even if that requires more revenue. Leans agree· based on record
Voted for the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82), the 2024 law repealing the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset, raising benefits for some public-sector retirees.
Strongly agrees· stated position
Platform highlights 'protecting Medicare and Social Security' and defending the programs so Americans are not priced out of basic care.
No public position found
Education & school choicePublic money should follow students to private, charter or home schools (universal school vouchers). No public position foundNo public position foundNo public position found
Environment & waterProtecting water quality, conservation land and climate resilience should take priority even if it slows development or raises costs. No public position foundLeans agree· stated position
Campaign priorities include defending coastal ecosystems, disaster resilience and addressing climate impacts that she says leave families and seniors vulnerable.
No public position found
Elections & votingVoting should be made easier (mail voting, drop boxes, restoring voting rights) rather than adding new restrictions. Leans disagree· based on record
Voted for H.R. 22, the SAVE Act (April 2025), which would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections; coded as supporting a new voting requirement rather than easing access.
No public position foundNo public position found
Crime & policingCriminal penalties should be tougher and police funding increased, rather than emphasizing reform and rehabilitation. Leans agree· based on record
Voted for the Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act (H.R. 2096), the 2025 bill repealing parts of the District of Columbia police-accountability law; a vote for it is coded as leaning toward tougher policing.
No public position foundNo public position found
Gender identity lawsFlorida's laws restricting gender-affirming care for minors and classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity should remain in place. Leans agree· based on record
Voted for the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act (H.R. 28), the 2025 bill barring transgender girls and women from female school sports under Title IX; a vote for it is coded as leaning toward keeping restrictions in place.
No public position foundNo public position found
Energy & utilitiesGovernment should promote renewable energy and tighten oversight of utility rate increases, even at the expense of fossil-fuel production. Leans disagree· based on record
Voted for the Protecting American Energy Production Act (H.R. 26), the 2025 bill barring a presidential moratorium on hydraulic fracturing without an act of Congress; a vote for it is coded as leaning toward fossil-fuel production.
No public position foundNo public position found
Tariffs & tradeTariffs on imported goods are good for the American economy. No public position foundNo public position foundNo public position found
UkraineThe U.S. should continue military aid to Ukraine. Leans disagree· based on record
What The Vote records him voting 'No' on a 2026 measure authorizing additional Ukraine aid including up to $8 billion in military assistance via loans; he was not among the 18 House Republicans listed as voting for the June 4, 2026 Ukraine aid bill.
No public position foundNo public position found
Trump administrationI approve of the direction of the Trump administration. Strongly agrees· stated position
Endorsed by President Trump for 2026; his statements describe H.R. 1 as 'delivering on promises made by President Trump' and he issued a statement supporting the administration's February 2026 Operation Epic Fury against Iran.
No public position foundNo public position found
VeteransExpanding VA services and veterans' benefits should be a top priority. No public position foundNo public position foundNo public position found

Where they sit on the map

Each candidate is placed by the average of their documented stances. It is a summary of the table above, not an extra judgment.

Social & legal issues ▲ Up = Conservative side of the statements ▼ Down = Progressive side of the statements Economic issues ◀ Left = larger government role Right = smaller government, lower taxes ▶ center line = neutral / mixed Rutherford
RepublicanDemocraticWrite-in· photo or initials inside each bubble · hover or tap for details
Not enough documented positions to place: Photo of Rachel GrageRachel GrageWilliam Upham
How the axes are computed

Each axis is the average of a candidate's coded stances (+2 to −2) on a fixed set of statements, so it comes straight from the documented positions and nothing else. A candidate needs at least three documented statements on an axis to be placed.

Economic issues (toward "Smaller government (lower taxes, less spending)"): Taxes & spending (agree), Property taxes (agree), Health care (disagree), Housing affordability (disagree), Property insurance (disagree), Energy & utilities (disagree), Social Security & Medicare (disagree), Teacher and staff pay (disagree).

Social & legal issues (toward "Conservative side of the statements"): Immigration (agree), Abortion (disagree), Guns (disagree), Education & school choice (agree), Elections & voting (disagree), Crime & policing (agree), Gender identity laws (agree), Marijuana (disagree), Environment & water (disagree), Trump administration (agree), Library and classroom materials (agree), School safety approach (agree).

CandidateEconomic issuesSocial & legal issues
John Rutherford0.75 (4 statements)1.33 (6 statements)
Rachel Gragenot enough data-1.00 (3 statements)
William Uphamnot enough datanot enough data

Other issues the candidates have raised

Priorities each candidate has brought up on their own, beyond the major-issue list above.

John Rutherford

Rachel Grage

William Upham